Do You Hear The Bloggers Sing

I'm a 25-year old lesbian. I watch too many shows and would watch even more if I had the time for it

circleturk:

is-the-snake-video-cute:

ciderli:

iicraft505:

iicraft505:

iicraft505:

image
image
image

Compilation of people holding things that shouldn’t be held, please add more if you have any

image
image
image
image

@chai-cow-ski

@is-the-snake-video-cute looks like a coral snake (blunt nose) but double checking- is it ?

That’s indeed a coral snake, good ID!!

This thread is full of the luckiest people on the planet, I think. Also goes to show just how calm even venomous snakes are - coral snakes rarely bite unless you’re actively harassing them - and how important it is to make sure your ID as non-venomous is 1000% certain before picking up any wild snake.

image

(via thepenguinlord)

mollymurakami:

Loose comic in three-ish parts. In the first section, Eddie has an arm drunkenly slung around Steve's shoulders as he talks to someone out of sight. Nancy leans into Steve and says, "So, has it occurred to you that you have a type?" In the next section, Steve looks between Eddie, who boops Steve's nose, and Nancy, who smiles back at him; Argyle lights up in the background. In the last section, Steve takes a drink from his cup and gestures to Jonathan and Robin, who are chatting and laughing in the foreground. Steve says, "You're one to talk," to Nancy, who gulps, Realizing™.ALT

“ronance may not have interacted much but the writers DID […] accidentally make robin nancy’s ‘type’ (intelligent but slightly weird social outcast kid with a heart of gold a la jonathan byers)[x]

i saw this and couldn’t get it out of my head, ty gayeddiemunson 🫡

(via thepenguinlord)

icedsodapop:

icedsodapop:

I’m seeing White liberals/leftists getting angry at Oprah over the situation at Maui and I just want to say this real quick:

image
image

Again, I want to preface this by saying that I’m not defending Oprah Winfrey for owning Hawaiian land, because she shouldn’t. But I also want to point out that the White pple getting angry at Oprah specifically is problematic becos:

1) it individualizes the problem and does not allow for further interrogation of US colonization of Hawaii and how the US goverment created the very conditions that allowed wealthy Americans to own Hawaiian land in the first place.

2) of the fact that Black women, will face harsher scrutiny than their White counterparts for every action they do, and Oprah is a hypervisible wealthy Black woman. I don’t see the same vitriol targeted towards White wealthy celebrities who own property in Hawaii like Jeff Bezos or Owen Wilson or Woody Harrelson or Willie Nelson or Jim Carrey, and so many more if you do a quick google of “celebrities who own Hawaii property”.

That is why I get wary when I see White and non-Black pple criticize Black public figures, simply because a lot of them, even if they are left-leaning, don’t examine their antiblack bias and hence, don’t question why they react so excessively vitriolic towards Black women. And sometimes, the criticism devolves into microaggressions, like it did with Lizzo and Carlee Russell.

Again, I just want to reiterate to White pple, esp White pple who consider themselves liberal/leftist/progressive/left-leaning in general, that y'all need to reflect on why y'all are so quick to jump to mockery/criticism/vitriol/outrage whenever people of color, esp women of color, fucked up or are perceived to have fucked up.

I included “perceived to have fucked up” becos y'all will jump on people of color over non-issues like what happened with John Boyega, Constance Wu and Marie Kondo

(via fandomshatewomen)

mswyrr:

“Here’s a horrifying statistic. Did you know that almost half of marriages these days do not end up in divorce? That means there’s a strong probability that you two get to watch each other die. And that’s the preferred outcome. To truly love another person is to accept that the work of loving them is worth the pain of losing them. And that’s it. That’s all.”

Mike Fanagan, “The Haunting of Bly Manor”

kirayaykimura:

answrs:

thebigcomed0wn:

putting “lying to kids is ok” on the table immediately looks bad. but theres nuance. because kids deserve to have as much context and respect as anyone else you live with. but also. telling them that leaving doors open will make ants carry away the entire house is necessary until their brains can quantify the heating&air bill

the ants:

image

#the kid asking me if his wooden toy horse has feelings doesnt need the truth he needs to get something off his chest (via amazingbouncingassbutt)

(via fluent-in-lesbianism)

desinteresse:

desinteresse:

It’s never been more lonely or isolating to be a young person than these last 5 years. Meeting actual people you can connect with takes a lot of energy and time so at the end of the day it’s the vulnerable people that are being left behind

And sometimes I lay awake and think ‘’What if I will forever be this lonely little thing? What if I die like this?’’ so im putting effort into preventing that. But I know not everyone is able to do that. I guess what im trying to say is that I suspect there are a lot of lonely people and these numbers will only increase. So if you’re lonely rn I just wanna say that you’re not alone in this. It’s just really hard

(via milkmaidmilf)

the-woman-of-belgravia:
“ lafemmedemon:
“ kungfucarrie:
“ thessalian:
“ oracleanne:
“ good-night-white-pride666:
“ Really happy to see this at my local library
”
OOOOH. *happy YA librarian dance*
”
I want this in every library, everywhere. After all,...

the-woman-of-belgravia:

lafemmedemon:

kungfucarrie:

thessalian:

oracleanne:

good-night-white-pride666:

Really happy to see this at my local library

OOOOH. *happy YA librarian dance*

I want this in every library, everywhere. After all, some kids won’t even google this stuff because they don’t want parents/siblings checking their browser history.

This is really awesome. And if you’re not familiar with how the Dewey Decimal system works - the numbers subject-based, which means these numbers are applicable in EVERY library. So if you see something you want to research on this list - look for those same numbers in any of your local libraries.

This is wonderful.

Reblogging to possibly save a life

(via writtenletterstotheworld)

delphinidin4:

mojo-chojo:

cheeseanonioncrisps:

liquidstar:

I just saw someone say the words “jokingly gaslight” this might be a good time to reintroduce the internet to the terms “lying” or perhaps “pranking” or even just “joking” on it’s own

Okay, say it with me guys…

If you are giving someone wrong information in the hopes that they’ll believe that it’s true, then that’s lying.

If you are giving someone wrong information under the assumption that they’ll ultimately realise that it’s false, and that they will find this funny, then that’s joking.

If you are giving someone wrong information in the hopes that they’ll believe that it’s true and that their response will be funny, then that’s a prank.

If you are giving someone wrong information in the hopes that they will notice the differences between your presentation of reality and their perception of it, and come to doubt their ability to judge what is and is not real, then that’s gaslighting.

image

now dont leave this in the tags

If you are giving someone wrong information and you assume they will know it is wrong, in hopes that they will play along, then that’s a bit.

(via literallyaflame)